Why Rhonda Patrick, Satchin Panda, and Andrew Huberman are wrong about intermittent fasting

In this video, I discuss the latest New England Journal of Medicine study on time-restricted feeding and some exceptionally bad takes on it. In particular, I detail how Andrew Huberman appears not to have read the study and mischaracterizes it on Twitter. Then, I talk about how Satchin Panda and Rhonda Patrick each mis-state important facts about and misinterpret the study’s significance. I use these examples as a sounding board to explain what we can in fact take away from the study—and indeed, from the research on time-restricted feeding to date.

===

Like, comment, subscribe.

For more, find me at:

PODCAST The Kevin Bass Show

YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/user/kbassphiladelphia

WEBSITE http://thedietwars.com

TWITTER https://twitter.com/kevinnbass/

https://twitter.com/healthmisinfo/

INSTAGRAM https://instagram.com/kevinnbass/

TIKTOK https://tiktok.com/@kevinnbass

And above all, please donate to support what I do:

PATREON https://patreon.com/kevinnbass/