A case in which the Court held that the mere retention of estate property after the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not violate 11 U.S.C. §362(a)(3), which operates as a “stay” of “any act” to “exercise control” over the property of the estate.
don't worry if you don't have an account with us, we'll create one
[{"meta":{"author":"U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments","authorlink":""},"src":"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/oyez.case-media.mp3\/case_data\/2020\/19-357\/19-357_20201013-argument.delivery.mp3","thumb":{"src":"https:\/\/lystnimg.b-cdn.net\/podcastsnw-202109\/1dbe25-a7a7-673a-9f86c0_800.jpg"},"title":"City of Chicago v. Fulton","link":"javascript:;","id":"item-1503673"}]
